If you are a Texas consumer currently involved in a lawsuit, judgment, or debt collection case, you may have encountered a court-appointed receiver named Linda Gimbel. Receivers are powerful court officers appointed to manage assets and satisfy judgments, but they are also bound by strict fiduciary duties and legal obligations.
Recently, concerns have been raised regarding specific behaviors associated with Linda Gimbel. We are actively investigating reports that she fails to communicate effectively with parties involved in her cases. Specifically, witnesses have noted that she does not respond to voice messages, ignores emails, and fails to respond to formal requests for an accounting.
If you have interacted with Linda Gimbel at 19179 Blanco Rd, Ste 422, San Antonio, Texas 78258, or attempted to reach her at (512) 560-0006 or via email at linda@texcr.net, your experience is relevant. Cannon Legal PLLC is seeking witnesses to come forward. Your testimony could be vital in establishing a pattern of behavior that may support a cause of action for those negatively affected.
Who is Linda Gimbel?
Linda Gimbel operates as a Texas receiver. In the context of Texas law, a receiver is often appointed by a court after a judgment has been rendered in a civil lawsuit. Their primary role is to locate non-exempt assets of a judgment debtor and liquidate them to pay off the debt owed to the judgment creditor.
Operating out of San Antonio, Texas, Ms. Gimbel is frequently tasked with these sensitive financial responsibilities. However, the power granted to a receiver is not unlimited. They are officers of the court, meaning they must act with transparency, fairness, and responsiveness.
When a receiver is appointed to your case, they effectively step into your financial life. They can freeze bank accounts, seize property, and demand financial records. Because the stakes are so high for the consumer, the receiver’s accessibility and adherence to procedure are paramount.
The Reported Issues: Silence and Lack of Transparency
A receiver has a job to do, but they also have a duty to respond to reasonable inquiries, especially regarding the status of seized assets or the balance of a judgment. We are currently gathering information from individuals who have experienced the following specific issues with Linda Gimbel:
1. Failure to Respond to Voice Messages
Communication is the bedrock of any legal proceeding. Consumers and their attorneys often need to contact the receiver to negotiate a payoff, clarify a seizure, or discuss a payment plan. Witnesses have reported that messages left at (512) 560-0006 often go unanswered, leaving debtors in a state of uncertainty and anxiety.
2. Ignoring Emails
In the modern legal landscape, email is a primary method of documentation. Sending correspondence to linda@texcr.net should result in a timely and professional acknowledgement. Reports suggest, however, that emails regarding critical case details are frequently ignored. This lack of digital paper trail can make it incredibly difficult for a consumer to prove they attempted to resolve their debt in good faith.
3. Refusal to Provide Accounting
Perhaps the most serious complaint involves the failure to respond to requests for an accounting. Under Texas law, a judgment debtor has a right to know how their money is being applied. If funds have been seized from a bank account or if payments have been made, the receiver must be able to show exactly how much was collected, what fees were deducted, and what the remaining balance is.
-
Without an accounting, a debtor cannot know if the judgment has been satisfied.
-
Without an accounting, there is no transparency regarding the receiver’s fees.
-
Refusing this request can be a breach of the receiver’s duties.
Why Your Experience Matters: A Call for Witnesses
Cannon Legal PLLC is currently investigating these claims to determine if there is a systemic failure in how these receiverships are being managed. We need to hear from you.
If you have experienced similar “stonewalling” tactics—where your calls to (512) 560-0006 were ignored or your requests for financial transparency were denied—you are not just a frustrated consumer; you are a potential witness.
By coming forward, you help us build a comprehensive picture of how Linda Gimbel operates. Individual complaints can sometimes be dismissed as isolated incidents, but a collection of witness statements demonstrating a clear pattern of non-responsiveness and opacity is powerful evidence in court. If a person comes forward about Linda Gimbel, they could possibly have a cause of action or assist others in removing an ineffective receiver.